Authorized and anonymized project references where each entry documents the feed characterization (TDS, COD, dominant salts), nameplate evaporation duty, configured process route (energy reuse × evaporator type × crystallizer type), and the specific process challenge that drove selection — not a gallery of nameplates. Where client confidentiality prevents full disclosure, only the process envelope and configuration family are published.
170+
Reference projects with documented feed, duty and process route
10
Industries served — chemical, battery, food, pharma and more
6+
Process route families: MVR, TVR, multi-effect, forced circulation, DTB, Oslo
Oslo (fluidized-bed / Krystal) crystallizers decouple supersaturation generation from crystal growth to deliver 2-5 mm crystals, CV under 5%, and impurities below 0.1%. Structure,
MVR vs multi-effect evaporation compared on energy, CAPEX, OPEX, payback, BPE limits, capacity fit, retrofit paths, and carbon impact, with typical consumption figures for
Evaporator troubleshooting guide: scaling, corrosion, foaming, entrainment, and falling evaporation rate diagnosed with cause chains, the seven-cause capacity checklist, compressor and vacuum deep-dives, and
Complete evaporator operation and maintenance guide: pre-start checks, four running parameters, salt crystallization temperature discipline, sequenced shutdown, three-tier downtime maintenance, winter protection, and a
Evaporator fouling and scaling mechanisms, seven warning signs, hardness control at ~100 ppm, antiscalants raising solubility 3-4x, seed slurry control, and mechanical, chemical and
Scraped surface = wiped film = agitated thin film evaporator: one machine for 100,000 cP feeds with seconds of residence time. Blade gap 0.5-1.5
External circulation evaporators run the loop outside the boiling vessel; natural circulation drives it by thermosiphon alone. Design numbers that decide fouling or clean
Evaporator sizing from first principles: material balance W=F(1-x0/x1), heat balance Q=Wr, Q=KAdT with four series resistances, effective temperature difference after BPE, a worked 10
Cut evaporator energy cost 65-86%: steam economy basics, MVR vs TVR vs multi-effect comparison with COP and payback, 100 t/d full cost model, multi-effect
How to select an evaporator: the 5-step method, wastewater characterization (BPE, chloride, fouling), material grades, TDS bands, and the MEE vs TVR vs MVR
Evidence constraint. Only authorized or anonymized project information is displayed on this page. Process parameters cited (TDS, COD, throughput, particle size distribution, steam economy) are bounded by documented operating conditions and should not be extrapolated to other feed compositions, capacities or utility profiles without project-specific re-validation.
Send your feed characterization (TDS, COD, main salts, viscosity), throughput and product targets — we respond with a preliminary process route within two business days.
